Found 58,011 results in 0.106 seconds. Displaying page 3 of 5,802, sorted by
Sent 2010-03-15 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>
Sorry - hit a bad keyboard short cut and sent this mid way through
writing it - please disregard and read the followup.
On 03/15/2010 07:21 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/15/2010 07:14 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>> : Development on branches/solr to get on lucene trunk is progressing at
>> : a f...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@...>
: They would not be able to re-use if you did this, because when you
: call reset(Reader) on them, the Reader would not be wrapped.
Hmmm... I'm not sure i understand how any declared CharFilter/TOkenizer
combo will be able to deal with this any better, but i'll take your word
for it.
Kill it ...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>
On 03/15/2010 07:14 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : Development on branches/solr to get on lucene trunk is progressing at
> : a furious (nay... ferocious) pace, pushed by the "not new, but new to
> : solr" committers. Feels great to have everyone on the same team!
>
> I feel like i must have miss...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Robert Muir <rcmuir@...>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> In the case of these factories: can't we eliminate the Html*Tokenizers
> themselves, but make the *factories* return the neccessary *Tokenizer
> wrapped in an HtmlStripCharFilter ?
They would not be able to re...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@...>
: Is there any concern with removing the deprecated HtmlStrip*Tokenizer factories?
I'm not adverse to gutting *internal* deprecated classes on just about any
release (requiring plugin writers to deal with the deprecation) but if
it's possible to keep things working for users with no java knowl...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@...>
: Development on branches/solr to get on lucene trunk is progressing at
: a furious (nay... ferocious) pace, pushed by the "not new, but new to
: solr" committers. Feels great to have everyone on the same team!
I feel like i must have missed out on some sort of discussion -- what was
the motiv...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Robert Muir <rcmuir@...>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> Is there a way we can fix LUCENE-2098 too?
>
I think this is good to fix, yet removing the deprecations is
unrelated to this slowdown.
The deprecated functionality (HtmlStrip*Tokenizer) is implemented in
t...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Teruhiko Kurosaka <Kuro@...>
Additional info:
When I changed the query term, Solr did use the updated XSL file.
I suspected that the firefox browser was doing its own caching
but the request log did show it is sending requests to Solr
even when the get URL is the same as previous one. So there
must be some caching going on ...
Sent 2010-03-15 by blargy <zmanods@...>
Thanks but I was thinking more of a way to check the datasource's current
internal configuration. IE, i wanted to check if I put batchsize -1 in the
sorlconfig.xml that it was actually set.
Anyway, back to my previous question. Is there a way to dynamically set the
values for the datasource in d...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinmangar@...>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any concern with removing the deprecated HtmlStrip*Tokenizer
> factories?
>
> These can be done with CharFilter instead and they have some problems
> with lucene's trunk.
>
> If no one objects, I'd like ...
