Search Results for

Found 90,739 results in 0.119 seconds. Displaying page 7 of 9,074, sorted by relevancydate

1. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Simon Willnauer <simon.willnauer@...>

   On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 AM, patrick o'leary wrote: > Hows that? > > Which vote has been passed? 1,2 or 3? > Considering how much has been discussed / altered in email threads, what's > actually been voted upon? > > The proposition is definitely unclear, and needs full flesh...

2. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

   Sent 2010-03-11 by patrick o'leary <pjaol@...>

   Hows that? Which vote has been passed? 1,2 or 3? Considering how much has been discussed / altered in email threads, what's actually been voted upon? The proposition is definitely unclear, and needs full fleshing out and discussion before another vote is called. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:29 P...

3. [lucene-user] RE: File descriptor leak in ParallelReader.reopen()

   Sent 2010-03-11 by Alexey Lef <alexey@...>

   I believe there is in fact a difference between 2.4.1 and 3.0.1 as far as leaking file descriptors is concerned. When sharing an IndexSearchere among multiple threads, instead of closing an old IndexSearcher/IndexReader, we used to follow the good old advice to "just drop it on the floor and let ...

4. [lucene-user] Re: surrogate pairs

   Sent 2010-03-11 by Yuta Kawadai <yutax77@...>

   Thank you. Now I use own Analyzer which based on "MeCab" (It's open source Japanese morphological analyzer). I try to modify it to support surrogate pairs. And I'm expecting the next release! Yuta 2010/3/11 Robert Muir : > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Yuta Kawadai

5. [lucene-user] Re: surrogate pairs

   Sent 2010-03-11 by Yuta Kawadai <yutax77@...>

   I'm sorry for lack of talk. I try to treat the text which contains "surrogate pairs" in Lucene. So, I want to confirm whether Lucene(core part, Analyzer, TokenFilter and so on) can treat terms which contains "surrogate pairs" or not. Thanks, Yuta 2010/3/11 Erick Erickson

6. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

   Sent 2010-03-11 by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <chris.a.mattmann@...>

   Hi Yonik, IMO, this vote has not passed. A bullet of this proposal proposes code modifications and this is subject to VETO per Apache guidelines: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto Since that point is up for debate, I think we can get clarification on this from the board at thei...

7. [lucene-general] Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words

   Sent 2010-03-11 by Robert Muir <rcmuir@...>

   On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Claudio R wrote: > Hi Robert. > The Solr's SynonymFilter recommends expanding the synonym > at indexing time. But it will make my index grow much. I can do a > replace in the query before QueryParser run, but this is an > anti-pattern. > Wha...

8. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

   Sent 2010-03-11 by Yonik Seeley <yonik@...>

   Thanks everyone, this vote has passed. A bit more contentious of a PMC vote than usual, but the committer vote was clear. -Yonik On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Apoligies in advance for calling yet another vote, but I just wanted > to make sure this wa...

9. [lucene-general] Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words

   Sent 2010-03-11 by Claudio R <usertec@...>

   Hi Robert. The Solr's SynonymFilter recommends expanding the synonym at indexing time. But it will make my index grow much. I can do a replace in the query before QueryParser run, but this is an anti-pattern. What do you suggest Robert? __________________________________________________...

10. [lucene-user] Re: DisjunctionMaxQuery with tie breaker=1 same as MultiFieldQueryParser?

    Sent 2010-03-11 by Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@...>

    : If I want to search let's say "ipod" in three different fields (device, : sound,technology) : Would be the same to use a DisjunctionMaxQuery with the tie braker = 1 than : to use a MultiFieldQueryParser with and OR to build the boolean queries? strictly speaking even with tie breaker of 1, a D...