Found 90,974 results in 0.225 seconds. Displaying page 6 of 9,098, sorted by
Sent 2010-03-14 by Michael Busch <buschmic@...>
+1
Michael
On 3/14/10 9:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existing contrib comm...
Sent 2010-03-14 by Robert Muir <rcmuir@...>
+1
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this would make...
Sent 2010-03-14 by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <chris.a.mattmann@...>
Hey Grant,
> Yeah, I agree this would be a good thing and would make sense in the near
> future. I think we should iron out the TLP stuff first and we should let
> Nutch discuss what it's plans for modularization are. But yeah, I'm
> definitely open to discussing it.
>
> I think we sometimes...
Sent 2010-03-14 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>
+1
Mike
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this woul...
Sent 2010-03-14 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>
On Mar 14, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hey Grant,
>
>> Also, I really don't see what is so drastic about the proposal. All we're
>> doing is making it easier for code to be put in the right place. We're not
>> having Lucene consumed by Solr nor vice versa. As you've ...
Sent 2010-03-14 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existing contrib committers be core committers. I think the notion of contrib co...
Sent 2010-03-14 by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <chris.a.mattmann@...>
Hey Grant,
> Also, I really don't see what is so drastic about the proposal. All we're
> doing is making it easier for code to be put in the right place. We're not
> having Lucene consumed by Solr nor vice versa. As you've seen by the Board's
> indication, they only view that there should be ...
Sent 2010-03-14 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>
Also, I really don't see what is so drastic about the proposal. All we're doing is making it easier for code to be put in the right place. We're not having Lucene consumed by Solr nor vice versa. As you've seen by the Board's indication, they only view that there should be a single Lucene proj...
Sent 2010-03-14 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>
On Mar 14, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Consider this just an email to clarify things for Otis (and maybe a few other people).
>
> Are the following the main goals of the recent merge voting thread(s)?
> * Make it easier for Solr to ride the Lucene trunk
> * Make it eas...
Sent 2010-03-14 by Yonik Seeley <yseeley@...>
I've merged JIRA permissions - let me know if I accidentally left anyone out.
Looking forward to the communities working more closely again!
(go Robert, go! ;-)
-Yonik
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Per the vote on general@ to merge committers,...
