Found 90,613 results in 0.122 seconds. Displaying page 5 of 9,062, sorted by
Sent 2010-03-09 by Mike Klaas <mike.klaas@...>
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> It should also be noted that a good chunk of the Solr committers are already Lucene committers, and of the remaining there are: Bill Au, Mike Klaas, Ryan McKinley, Shalin and Noble. Mike has been inactive for quite ...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@...>
: from Solr into Lucene don't need to be in there. All of a sudden I'm agreeing
: with Hoss about goals rather than actual steps ;) Because those points are not
: important to this vote at all - they are more examples of what we will be able
...
: This is about merging dev so we can put code whe...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@...>
: > I still don't like that we're voting on a "Goal"
:
: I don't quite understand what you mean here. As I read it, the proposal
: from Michael is pretty specific on details.
We are not voting on commiting a specific patch, or releasing a particular
bundle of source code, or on select a logo...
Sent 2010-03-09 by patrick o'leary <pjaol@...>
Sigh...
http://www.surveymonkey.com/
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > * I think Grant may be right. We don't need this discussion. Because
> the Solr/Lucene developer overlap is ...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>
On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
>
> * I think Grant may be right. We don't need this discussion. Because the Solr/Lucene developer overlap is excellent, why not just start moving selected Solr code to new Lucene modules, just like Mike proposed we move Analysis from Lu...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>
Java does that.
Mike
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Justin wrote:
> Should these be explicitly initialized to false?
>
>
> private boolean fieldSortDoTrackScores;
> private boolean fieldSortDoMaxScore;
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Marvin Humphrey <marvin@...>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:18:12PM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> >> You said "of course" before but... how in your proposal could one
> >> store all stats for a given field during indexing, but then sometimes
> >> use match-only and sometimes full-scoring when querying against that
> >> f...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Justin <crynax@...>
Should these be explicitly initialized to false?
private boolean fieldSortDoTrackScores;
private boolean fieldSortDoMaxScore;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional comman...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Uwe Schindler <uwe@...>
Hi Scott,
The only possibility you may get help is to provide us with some test code that builds an index and queries it to produce the error. The problem is that you gave us not enough information about your queries and index contents. Maybe you have some problems with precisionStep wrong (must...
Sent 2010-03-09 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> > I don't know that compressing the raw materials is going to work as well as
>> > compressing the final product. Early quantization errors get compounded when
>> > used in later calculations.
>>
>> I would not c...
