Search Results for

Found 90,824 results in 0.196 seconds. Displaying page 3 of 9,083, sorted by relevancydate

1. [lucene-dev] Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2308) Separately specify a field's type

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Marvin Humphrey <marvin@...>

   On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 03:01:27PM -0500, Mark Miller wrote: > Committers are competant in different areas of the code. Even mike > wasn't big into the search side until per segment. Commiters are > trusted to mess with the pieces they know. Absolutely. I wouldn't expect every committer t...

2. [lucene-dev] Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2308) Separately specify a field's type

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>

   Committers are competant in different areas of the code. Even mike wasn't big into the search side until per segment. Commiters are trusted to mess with the pieces they know. I don't see anyone even remotely suggesting that users should have to understand all of the implications of posti...

3. [lucene-dev] Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2308) Separately specify a field's type

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Erick Erickson <erickerickson@...>

   Congrats Chris! I vote for thinkAboutNotIncludingNormsMaybe(true|false) ..... Seriously double negatives are ugly IMO, +1 for changing.... Erick On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Chris Male (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=c...

4. [lucene-general] Re: Umbrella Projects

   Sent 2010-03-12 by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <chris.a.mattmann@...>

   Hey All, I started a thread over in tika-dev@ to discuss TLP. I'll take that feedback after a few weeks and bring it to the larger community (and eventually PMC) to discuss/vote. Key phrase: after a few weeks. I'm VOTE'd out and am going to get back to work for a while. Take care. Cheers, Chri...

5. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>

   On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:54 AM, patrick o'leary wrote: >>> Go look at the votes. > > Which ones? from vote 1 2 or 3?? 3. That is this thread.

6. [lucene-dev] Re: Welcome Chris Male as Contrib committer!

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinmangar@...>

   Welcome Chris! On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I am happy to announce the Lucene PMC has accepted Chris Male as a > contrib committer! > > Chris has been making a lot of headway in cleaning up the spacial contrib lately, > and hopefully now we can ...

7. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

   Sent 2010-03-12 by patrick o'leary <pjaol@...>

   >>Go look at the votes. Which ones? from vote 1 2 or 3?? On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > > > Here's what I didn't like. The vote was: > > > > * ambiguous > > * something that the ...

8. [lucene-dev] Re: Welcome Chris Male as Contrib committer!

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>

   Welcome aboard Chris! Mike On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > I am happy to announce the Lucene PMC has accepted Chris Male as a > contrib committer! > > Chris has been making a lot of headway in cleaning up the spacial contrib > lately, > and hopefull...

9. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

   Sent 2010-03-12 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>

   On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Here's what I didn't like. The vote was: > > * ambiguous > * something that the Solr devs tried to push through and bullied folks on during discussion (those who originally had questions were persuaded that it was the "right thing ...

10. [lucene-general] Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)

    Sent 2010-03-12 by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <chris.a.mattmann@...>

    Here's what I didn't like. The vote was: * ambiguous * something that the Solr devs tried to push through and bullied folks on during discussion (those who originally had questions were persuaded that it was the "right thing to do" by those in the PMC leadership). * not healthy for the project *...