Found 91,029 results in 0.034 seconds. Displaying page 1 of 9,103, sorted by
Sent 2010-03-16 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>
On 03/16/2010 07:05 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> Wow, you guys are moving fast! Thats a good thing.
>
> IRC is fine if you want to discuss something quickly. But it has its
> limitations. For example, I cannot follow IRC most of the times
> because I'm in a different time zone. But I do...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinmangar@...>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 03:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
>>
>> One more thing which I wonder about even more is that this whole
>> merging happens so quickly for reasons I don't see right now. I don't
>> want to keep anybody f...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>
I think it like the 1st option best (lucene moves as subdir to solr's
current trunk SVN path), but I don't feel strongly.
This'd mean one could simply checkout lucene alone and do everything
you can do today.
But if you check out solr, you also get a full checkout of lucene, and
solr's build.xm...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>
On 03/16/2010 03:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
> One more thing which I wonder about even more is that this whole
> merging happens so quickly for reasons I don't see right now. I don't
> want to keep anybody from making progress but it appears like a rush
> to me.
>
Meh - I think your jus...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> On 3/16/10 12:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>>
>> If my impression should be wrong or if I miss something please ignore
>> the last paragraph.
>
> I feel exactly like you, Simon. I don't understand the rush. Also, we'r...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Rene Hackl-Sommer <rene.a.hackl@...>
Hi Daniel,
Unless you have only a few documents and a small index, I don't think
never calling optimize is going to be a means you should rely upon.
What about if you reindexed the documents you are deleting, adding a
field with the value "true"? This would imply that
eit...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>
An incidental merge will delete them.
I think you'll have to maintain your own filter... but it shouldn't be
that large? Ie it's as large as deleted docs BitVector would be
anyway... except that the docs never go away.
Mike
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Daniel Noll wrote...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Uwe Schindler <uwe@...>
Hi,
> And Lucene is on Java 1.5 and should be compiled with an 1.5 compiler,
> where Solr seems to be on 1.6 since yesterday? (Yonik added something
> to common-build.xml). On my development system I have no Java 1.6
> installed at all as default build, I ever use Java 1.5 for building
> Lucene....
Sent 2010-03-16 by Rene Hackl-Sommer <rene.a.hackl@...>
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the input! I am now going to put in some work to see how
things fare.
Should I post the question about substituting int with long on
lucene-dev again, if need arises?
Thanks again,
Rene
Am 15.03.2010 23:04, schrieb Steven A Rowe:
> Hi Rene,
>
> Have you seen SpanNotQue...
Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael Busch <buschmic@...>
On 3/16/10 12:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> If my impression should be wrong or if I miss something please ignore
> the last paragraph.
>
I feel exactly like you, Simon. I don't understand the rush. Also,
we're in review-and-commit process, not commit-and-review. Changes have
to be pr...
