Enterprise Search support for Apache Lucene and Solr by Lucid Imagination

Secondary links

  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Downloads
  • Solutions
    • Software |
    • Services |
    • Training |
    • White Papers & Case Studies |
    • Webinars & Events |
  • Developers
    • Blog |
    • Tech Articles |
    • Community |
    • Documentation |
    • Downloads |
    • Webcasts & Podcasts |
  • About
    • Market Overview |
    • Management |
    • Company News |
    • In the Media |
    • Contact |

beta

Start new search

Options

  • results per page

Clear all facets

  • Project clear projects

  • Source clear sources

  • Author clear authors

Search Results for

Results loading...

Found 91,029 results in 0.034 seconds. Displaying page 1 of 9,103, sorted by

  1. [lucene-dev] Re: lucene and solr trunk

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>

    On 03/16/2010 07:05 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > Wow, you guys are moving fast! Thats a good thing. > > IRC is fine if you want to discuss something quickly. But it has its > limitations. For example, I cannot follow IRC most of the times > because I'm in a different time zone. But I do...

  2. [lucene-dev] Re: lucene and solr trunk

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinmangar@...>

    On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > On 03/16/2010 03:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > >> >> One more thing which I wonder about even more is that this whole >> merging happens so quickly for reasons I don't see right now. I don't >> want to keep anybody f...

  3. [lucene-dev] Re: lucene and solr trunk

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>

    I think it like the 1st option best (lucene moves as subdir to solr's current trunk SVN path), but I don't feel strongly. This'd mean one could simply checkout lucene alone and do everything you can do today. But if you check out solr, you also get a full checkout of lucene, and solr's build.xm...

  4. [lucene-dev] Re: lucene and solr trunk

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>

    On 03/16/2010 03:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > > One more thing which I wonder about even more is that this whole > merging happens so quickly for reasons I don't see right now. I don't > want to keep anybody from making progress but it appears like a rush > to me. > Meh - I think your jus...

  5. [lucene-dev] Re: lucene and solr trunk

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>

    On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Busch wrote: > On 3/16/10 12:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: >> >> If my impression should be wrong or if I miss something please ignore >> the last paragraph. > > I feel exactly like you, Simon. I don't understand the rush. Also, we'r...

  6. [lucene-user] Re: "Deleting" documents without deleting them

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Rene Hackl-Sommer <rene.a.hackl@...>

    Hi Daniel, Unless you have only a few documents and a small index, I don't think never calling optimize is going to be a means you should rely upon. What about if you reindexed the documents you are deleting, adding a field with the value "true"? This would imply that eit...

  7. [lucene-user] Re: "Deleting" documents without deleting them

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael McCandless <lucene@...>

    An incidental merge will delete them. I think you'll have to maintain your own filter... but it shouldn't be that large? Ie it's as large as deleted docs BitVector would be anyway... except that the docs never go away. Mike On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Daniel Noll wrote...

  8. [lucene-dev] RE: lucene and solr trunk

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Uwe Schindler <uwe@...>

    Hi, > And Lucene is on Java 1.5 and should be compiled with an 1.5 compiler, > where Solr seems to be on 1.6 since yesterday? (Yonik added something > to common-build.xml). On my development system I have no Java 1.6 > installed at all as default build, I ever use Java 1.5 for building > Lucene....

  9. [lucene-user] Re: Increase number of available positions?

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Rene Hackl-Sommer <rene.a.hackl@...>

    Hi Guys, Thanks for the input! I am now going to put in some work to see how things fare. Should I post the question about substituting int with long on lucene-dev again, if need arises? Thanks again, Rene Am 15.03.2010 23:04, schrieb Steven A Rowe: > Hi Rene, > > Have you seen SpanNotQue...

  10. [lucene-dev] Re: lucene and solr trunk

    Sent 2010-03-16 by Michael Busch <buschmic@...>

    On 3/16/10 12:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > If my impression should be wrong or if I miss something please ignore > the last paragraph. > I feel exactly like you, Simon. I don't understand the rush. Also, we're in review-and-commit process, not commit-and-review. Changes have to be pr...

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. >>

Solr Powered

Give us your feedback

  • Lucene
  • Solr
  • Nutch
  • Tika
  • Mahout
  • Droids
  • PyLucene
  • Lucene.Net
  • Lucy
  • Lucene4c
  • Open Relevance Project
  • How We Can Help:
    • Getting Started |
    • Support Subscriptions |
    • White Papers |
    • Training |
    • Consulting |
    • Contact Us |
  • Developers:
    • Blog |
    • Documentation |
    • Tech Articles |
    • Podcasts and Videos |
    • Community |
  • Downloads:
    • LucidWorks for Solr |
    • LucidWorks for Lucene |
    • LucidGaze for Solr |
    • LucidGaze for Lucene |
  • Products:
  • Services:

Contact | Privacy Policy | Legal Terms of Use | Copyrights and Disclaimers | Admin

Apache Solr, Apache Lucene, ApacheCon and their logos are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation.

© 2010 Lucid Imagination. All Right reserved.